I recently asked several magazines for their prices for advertising as we are trying to get the word out there that we give Remote Viewing Training in May 2010.
Since Remote Viewing is not only based on scientific protocols but also a helpful research tool, we considered putting an advertisement in one of Australia’s most popular science magazines ‘COSMOS’.
Instead of providing us with the advertising rates, they came back with the following reply!
”Dear Sandra,
Thanks for your interest in Cosmos Magazine. I have checked into remote viewing and the content is not something that would be relevant to our readers; they are interested in science not in the paranormal.
I wish you all the best for 2010.
Regards,
XXXX”
I kindly pointed out to this person the publication in the IEEE proceedings of 1976 by Hall Putthoff and Russell Targ. On top of that the researchers from Princeton University, the University of Amsterdam and several private institutions working on Anomalous Cognition, Consciousness and other related fields.
I also pointed out that we have personally trained doctors, engineers, designers and other well educated professionals in the skill of Remote Viewing and that they now use this skill in their work!
It is very disappointing to find that Australia is 34 years behind on the scientific developments, while the US, China and several European Countries have made very important progress in this field. There is apparently still a taboo on this subject in Australia.
This taboo results in a distorted view of what science is actually about!
I give up on people who have already made up their minds that this field is not science. They are actually just as biased as those who take anything for granted!
On http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/ you read …
COSMOS –The Science of Everything!!
Well…The science of everything is pretty selective as it excludes certain science that interest 80% of the population, but not the COSMOS readers!
What science is all about is!!! an interesting notion, How can we even have a science when there is no ’science’ for the apparatus we use to use science, ie consciousness, there is no science of consciousness….as far as im concerned all bets are off on everything including physics untill we actually understand the the very thing we use to discover things….ie the mind….my monies on David Wilcocks and his version of Space/ time and time/space… space being 3D here in space/time….and time being ‘3D’ in time/space add that to the idea that our shared minds are most almost certainly in time/space and a plethora of ideas fall into the mind, interestingly ’science’ cannot cut this up and stick it under a microscope so there for its ‘bad science’……..the truth isn’t out there at all……its inside, thats the only way i can describe it… the mind…OR ‘youve got to get in to get out’…. Mwooohahahahaggghh
This response is typical for the world and not only in Australia. You would get the same answer here in Germany. Sad but true. Scientific people don’t want to deal with RV because it is now part of the esoteric world. And RVers don’t want to deal with the esoteric world because RV is too scientific. So RV is something which seems to not fit anywhere which makes it hovering in the nowhere.